Brüssel/Belgien: Computers, Privacy and Data Protection
Beginn: Do 28. Jan 00:00:00 CET 2010Ende: Sa 30. Jan 23:59:59 CET 2010
Ort: Kaaitheater, Akenkaai 2, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Geodaten: (0),(0)
Kartenausschnitt anzeigen:
Kontakt: http://www.cpdpconferences.org/
The annual Conference
Computers, Privacy and Data Protection
aims to create a bridge between
policymakers, academics, practitioners and activists.
Objectives CPDP
1 Identifying and addressing new challenges to be faced by computer privacy and data protection,
especially with regards to issues related to profiling and autonomic computing,
2 Bringing together, in a high level expertise conference, most of the academic key specialists in the field,
data protection commissioners, computer scientists, practitioners, activists and people from
standardization bodies and ICT industries,
3 Addressing recommendations to private and public policy makers in the context of the
E.U. Privacy Law and the E.U. Data Protection Directive Review.
CPDP 2010 Conference Program | ||||
 | ||||
 | ||||
 | | | | |
| | | |
9.00 Elements of choice: Data Protection and its stakeholder community today Paul DE HERT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel LSTS (BE), University of Tilburg TILT (NL)
9.15 Panel 1 FORGETFULNESS AND DATA RETENTION The panel will review forgetfulness from a multidisciplinary perspective and address issues such as the possibility or impossibility of providing new technical, legal or social solutions to better protect forgetfulness (or to allow subjects to regain some control on their personal data). Forgetfulness, or the right to be forgotten is often referred to as one of the essential dimensions of privacy. Forgetfulness is explicitly protected by privacy laws which require that data must not be recorded longer than the time needed for the purpose of the collection. This principle, however, is very difficult to put into practice at a time when storing information is so cheap and easy that it becomes the by-default rule and data is more and more disseminated over Internet, creating a new form of nuisance which has been referred to as ‘data pollution’. The overall result of this trend is a loss of control of the subjects on their personal data. Panel hosted by Claudia DIAZ, KULeuven ESAT/COSIC (BE) & Daniel LE METAYER, INRIA (FR) Panel Patrick Breyer, Working Group on Data Retention (DE); Claude Castelluccia,INRIA (FR); Jean-François Blanchette, University of California (US); Andreas Pfitzmann, Dresden University of Technology (DE); Peter Fleischer, Google (US)
11.00 Coffee break 11.20 Panel 2 FOCUS ON A EU AGENDA: TRUST IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY Trust is at the core of our social order and economic prosperity. It is the basis for economic transactions and inter-human communication. The Internet and the Web are transforming society in a fundamental way. Although the Web exists only for 15 years it already has great impact on our lives and on society. But with the Web moving towards the centre, its many weaknesses are also exposed. Cyber crime, data loss and breaches, identity theft and commercial profiling and linking are all increasing. Addressing these and other challenges will require seamless cooperation between technology development, understanding societal requirement and acceptance, and the development of the legal and economic environment. Panel presented by Jacques Bus, European Commission, DG INFSO (EU)
11.50 Panel 3 WHAT WAS ON THE LAW FIRMS AGENDA IN 2009? The panel aims at presenting an overview of the main topics and issues debated by Law firms during 2009. Panel hosted by Christopher KÜNER, Hunton & Williams (BE) Panel Pascale Gelly, Cabinet Gelly (FR); Jan Dhont, Lorenz (BE)
12.45 Lunch 14.00 Panel 4 WHAT WAS ON THE US AGENDA IN 2009? The panel aims at presenting an overview of the main proposals and initiatives advanced in the US and Canada during 2009, as well as the relevant topics and issues raised by such proposals. Panel hosted by Erik VALGAEREN, Stibbe (BE) & Jay STANLEY, ACLU (US) Panel Paul Rosenzweig, Department of Homeland Security (US); Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy (US); Anne-Christine LACOSTE, European Data Protection Supervisor (EU)
15.00 Coffee break 15.30 Panel 5 WHAT WAS ON THE NATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AGENDA IN 2009? European data protection law has become influential outside the EU. Countries such as Argentina, Japan and New Zealand have adopted privacy laws that show influence from the European model. A central tenet of EU data protection law is the national data protection authority. All these authorities deal with an impressive data protection case load and deliver reports and opinions that are often very valuable. A short selection. Panel hosted by Willem DEBEUCKELAERE, CPVP/CBL (BE) Panel Nataša Pirc Musar, Information Commissioner (SLO); Speaker* of the Spanish Data Protection Authority (ES); Francesca Bignami, George Washington Law School (US)
16.30 Panel 6 IDENTITY IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY There is consensus building that identity is the missing layer of the internet. Lack of convenience, interoperability, privacy and international policies hamper the development of the information society. One of the key problems is that the concept of ‘identity’ is unclear. People create virtual identities on social networks sites and virtual worlds, have numerous accounts at different service providers, may have an identity card with embedded chip, etc. How do these relate? This panel will bring to the fore different conceptions of identity and identity management and discuss the legal issues and challenges surrounding the ‘identity problem’. Panel hosted by Ronald LEENES & Bibi VAN DEN BERG, University of Tilburg TILT (NL) Panel Bibi van den Berg, University of Tilburg (NL); Ronald Leenes, University of Tilburg (NL); Wainer Lusoli, IPTS, EC Joint Research Center (EU); Robin Wilton, Future Identity Ltd. (UK)
17.30 Sponsored Drink
20.15 PhD & Scholars Evening Presentations (till 22.30) Up to 10 PhD Researchers and Scholars are selected to present their projects and researches during this event. The selection will be made by Ronald Leenes and Bert-Jaap Koops (University of Tilburg, NL), from people speaking at main CPDP fora and in particular out of researchers who reacted to the CPDP Call for Papers. http://www.cpdpconferences.org/callforpapers.html
9.00 Panel 7 REVISING THE DIRECTIVE: PARLIAMENT’S PERSPECTIVE As we approach the second cycle of review of the 1995 Data Protection Directive, the role of the European Parliament will be critical for ensuring that the citizen’s interests are fully represented. Successive Eurobarometer surveys have shown that there is a low level of awareness of DP rights (and even lower levels of exercise of these rights), but paradoxically public concern about information privacy continues to grow. In the sphere of public security, after initial opposition to mandatory systematic data retention, Parliament ultimately acquiesced to these measures in 2002 and 2005 (despite criticism related to their incompatibility with fundamental rights), and the structural complexity of the Telecoms Package has stifled public debate on its controversial privacy aspects. Enforcement of DP is carried out by national supervisory bodies, but increasingly requires effective cross-border co-operation which is strained by the known divergences between national transpositions. Overall there seems to be little discussion about how both the form and substance of privacy protection can be substantially improved (for example by the application of advanced privacy technology or the strengthening of fundamental rights commensurate with the challenges of the digital era). Will Parliament be able to intervene more effectively and constructively with a role strengthened by the Lisbon treaty? How can civil society help Parliament better understand the false and genuine dilemmas of the public policy of privacy? Panel hosted by Caspar BOWDEN, Microsoft EMEA (UK) Panel Carlos Coelho, European Parliament, EPP-ED (PT), Stavros Lambrinidis*, European Parliament, S&D (GR); Sophie In’t Veld, European Parliament, ALDE (NL); Jan Philipp Albrecht, European Parliament, Greens (DE)
10.30 Coffee break 10.45 Panel 8 REVISING THE DIRECTIVE: EXPERTS’ PERSPECTIVE The discussions will focus on the review of Directive 95/46/EC. The advent of the ubiquitous information society might require a far more ambitious response from the European legislator. What are the pending issues still to be solved? Which new challenges are to require action during the following years? Which innovative approaches shall be imagined? The debate has only started. Panel hosted by Yves POULLET, University of Namur CRID (BE) Panel Jacob Kohnstamm, Art.29 Data Protection Working Party (NL); Lee Bygrave, University of Oslo (NO); Joseph Savirimuthu, Liverpool Law School (UK); Patrick Van Eecke, University of Antwerpen (BE), Thierry LEONARD, Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis (BE)
11.45 Panel 9 WHAT WAS ON THE PTA AGENDA IN 2009? Most parliaments in Europe have for some years had an institution that supports policy-making about new scientific and technological developments. These institutions are united in the EPTA Network (European Parliamentary Technology Assessment Network). These institutions try to chart the promises as well as the challenges posed by technological developments, in the ethical, medical, socio-economic, cultural and ecological sphere through research projects, expert polls and participative methods and techniques that allow gauging the public opinion on these developments. In this panel a selection is presented of privacy issues. Panel hosted by Johann CAS, Institute of Technology Assesment (AT) Panel Jacob Skjødt Nielsen, DBT (DK); Christine Hafskjold, PRISE Project Manager, Norwegian Board of Technology (NO); Arnd Weber, Institute for Technology Assesment and Systems analysis (DE)
12.45 Lunch 14.00 Panel 10 SURVEILLANCE IN FRANCE: STRATEGIES AND COUNTERSTRATEGIES 30 years after the adoption of its Data Protection Act, the time for assessment of surveillance and social control policies has finally come in France. In 2008, the creation of EDVIGE provoked a large mobilization in the society, forcing the govern-ment to step back on this massive routine intelligence database. This wakened the awareness on a strong and enduring French trend to set up large police files, to use biometric and genetic data, and to target vulnerable populations, such as foreigners and migrants, poor people and, last but not least, children and youngster. In 2009, a further concern emerged through the discussion on the HADOPI law trying to implement the ‘graduated response’ or the ‘three strikes approach’ against file sharers, as well as following the announcement of new measures to fight cybercrime. 2009 has seen numerous assessment reports, discussions and actions on all these issues. Panel hosted by Meryem MARZOUKI, CNRS (FR) & EDRI (EU) Panel Jérémie Zimmermann, La Quadrature du Net (FR); Jean-Pierre Dubois, French League of Human Rights (FR); Speaker* from the French Data Protection Authority (FR)
15.00 Coffee break 15.30 Panel 11 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) AND SMART VEHICLES ICT is increasingly embedded in different transportation means and based on an information infrastructure. In the field of road transport ITS provides innovative services on transport modes and traffic management to various users such as travellers, road transport infrastructure users and operators, fleet managers etc. In addition, cars are becoming autonomous, self-organising, wireless communications networks connected to the ITS infrastructure as well as to the conventional mobile networks. The connectedness of cars and the existence of a ubiquitous infrastructure allows the unprecedented collection of data about citizens’ movements. The panel aims at presenting an overview of the technical developments and applications and how possible privacy and data protection issues are addressed. Panel hosted by Michael FRIEDEWALD, Fraunhofer ISI Panel Antonio KUNG, Trialog (FR); Christophe GEUENS, KU Leuven Center for Law & ICT (BE); Frank Kargl, University of Twente (NL), Dr.-Ing. Albert Held, Daimler AG (DE)
17.00 CONCLUDING NOTES Peter HUSTINX, European Data Protection Supervisor, EDPS (EU)
A series of linked privacy events will be organised on Thursday 28th of January 2010 throughout Brussels, with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel as a main or a co-organiser together with other civil society actors.
14.30 EVENT • THINK PRIVACY! (EU Parliament) THINK PRIVACY KIDS COMPETITION (EU Parliament) THINK PRIVACY KIDS PARLIAMENT AND POLITICAL DEBATE (EU Parliament) What? Think Privacy events are part of a campaign to celebrate data protection day and promote privacy amongst young citizens. Who? European Schoolnet, COFAS, Microsoft & Vrije Universiteit Brussel LSTS See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5Ojglaly9w and http://dpd.eun.org
20.20 EVENT • Pecha Kucha NIGHT BRUSSELS (Kaaitheater) till 22.20 What? Pecha Kucha was conceived in 2003 by architects Astrid Klein and Mark Dytham for their nightclub Superdeluxe in Tokio as a platform for young designers. Who? Vrije Universiteit Brussel LSTS & Crosstalks with the support of Intel and Google Registration manditory http://pechakucha.architempo.net
AWARD CEREMONY • EUROPEAN CIVIL SOCIETY DATA PROTECTION PRIZE (Kaaitheater) What? During the break of the Pecha Kucha event a prize will be awarded to a European NGO having contributed in an original way to European civil society resistance to wrong data protection policies or to strengthening the European climate of respect for privacy values. From January 15th on the selected NGOs will be presented at http://deburen.eu/nl/thinking-europe Who? Association Européenne pour la défense des Droits de l’Homme (AEDH), European Digital Rights (EDRI) with the support of Vrije Universiteit Brussel LSTS & de Buren 22.30 Privacy Party • IDENTITY STILL UNDER CONTROL? (Botanique) What? This unique event will pay attention to the many possibilities, benefits, and risks of security measures and ‘big brother’ issues that may be present and may or may not be evident to the public eye. An audiovisual team and several camera’s and computer-based tracking will make the party into a bold concept where members may be tracked and traced, and projected on-screen or otherwise come under scrutiny. This event will have a deeper look into privacy implications of modern technologies and present an original dubstep view of the Brussels nightlife experience. Who? Ligue des droits de l’homme, Liga voor de rechten van de Mens Vrije Universiteit Brussel LSTS & Je M’en Fish http://www.jemenfish.be | |||
Zurück zur Terminliste
Kommentar abgeben
