Vote on anti-terrorism directive next Wednesday
After the approval of the Committee on Internal Affairs (LIBE) and the vote in the trialogue negotiations, the controversial anti-terrorism directive will now be put to the vote in the EU Parliament next Wednesday. In February we wrote an open letter to the LIBE Committee together with other civil societies.
Our main criticisms were that
- for the fight against terrorism, fundamental rights such as freedom of the press and freedom of information should be dragged down,
- authorities across Europe should issue such distance orders,
- the EU intends to delegate this "fight" to private companies, assuming they will do it right.
Probably out of "national interests", too, our second point of criticism has been addressed. According to the present text, only the national authorities may proceed to the providers domiciled there and they are entitled to appeal against these orders.
Our main criticism remained unheard. That is why we have now written again, this time to all Members of the European Parliament. Unfortunately we do not expect Parliament to reject the directive, but at least we want to renew our criticism and hope that amendments will at least not reverse the text to its latter form.
Our letter reads
Brussels, 12 April 2019
Dear Members of the European Parliament,
We, the undersigned organisations, are writing to you ahead of the plenary vote on the Proposal on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online on Wednesday 17th April with an urgent concern which we would like to bring to your attention. We welcome the improvements the committees, and particularly the LIBE Committee have made to the initial text and we urge you to reject any further Amendment which undermines those improvements .
We regret, however, that the adopted text still makes the untenable requirement to remove content within 1 hour from receipt of removal orders . Hosting service providers cooperate and work together with civil society and enforcement agencies to do their utmost at removing and preventing the dissemination of harmful and terrorist content. An inflexible and rigid provision, however, could have unintended consequences both on European users’ fundamental rights and on the Internet ecosystem.
This extremely short deadline, coupled with onerous sanctions, would entail over-removal of lawful content which will negatively impact the freedom of expression and related fundamental rights of European users . Similar concerns have been expressed by the three UN Special Rapporteurs in their joint opinion and by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Furthermore, the proposed timeframe does not take into account the size and economic capacity of hosting service providers. European small and medium-sized enterprises not operating a 24/7 service, for instance, would not be able to comply with removal orders being sent outside of working hours. Finally, there is no evidence to suggest that the 1-hour timeframe upon receipt of the removal order is appropriate or necessary to reduce the threat of terrorist content spreading online.
We would, therefore, like to urge you to vote in favour of a more pragmatic approach that would mandate hosting service providers to execute removal orders "as soon as possible", instead of in 1 hour
Such an amendment would be compliant with European citizens’ fundamental rights and protect the competitiveness of digital businesses while ensuring a useful framework of cooperation between hosting service providers and Member States to tackle the dissemination of terrorist content online.
Sincerely,
- Access Now , defends and extends the digital rights of users at risk around the world https://www.accessnow.org/
- Aktion Freiheit statt Angst e.V. - https://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/
- Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) – https://cdt.org/
- CZ.NIC - https://www.nic.cz/
- eco - Association of the Internet Industry - https://international.eco.de/
- EuroISPA , the pan-European association of Internet Services Providers Associations – www.euroispa.org
- Finnish Federation for Communications and Teleinformatics (FiCom) https://www.ficom.fi/english
- Hermes Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights - https://www.hermescenter.org/
- Homo Digitalis , focuses on the protection of Internet users in Greece https://www.homodigitalis.gr/
- ISPA Austria - https://www.ispa.at/english.html
- XNet - Internet Freedoms - https://xnet-x.net
Read more in the letter https://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/images/docs/201904JointLetterTerrorRegPlenary.pdf
Category[21]: Unsere Themen in der Presse Short-Link to this page: a-fsa.de/e/32o
Link to this page: https://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/de/articles/6851-20190413-zweiter-brief-gegen-anti-terror-richtlinie.htm
Link with Tor: http://a6pdp5vmmw4zm5tifrc3qo2pyz7mvnk4zzimpesnckvzinubzmioddad.onion/de/articles/6851-20190413-zweiter-brief-gegen-anti-terror-richtlinie.htm
Tags: #Grundrechte #Menschenrechte #Upload-Filter #Anti-Terror-Kampf #EU #Kommission #Parlament #Verordnung #Zensur #Transparenz #Informationsfreiheit #Anonymisierung #Meinungsmonopol #Meinungsfreiheit #Pressefreiheit #Internetsperren #Netzneutralität #Freizügigkeit #Unschuldsvermutung #Verhaltensänderung
Created: 2019-04-13 09:35:33
Kommentar abgeben